DEL.ICIO.US

Search


Maybe useful...


« Steampunk Second Life city | Main | Imagine Cup '08 winner: City Rain »

July 14, 2008

Media Guardian 100: no gamers

Interesting, isn't it, how videogames are often considered to be technology rather than plain old media, by newspapers and journos?

The BBC files its gaming news under Technology, despite videogames' cultural popularity and signficance. True, to file games under Entertainment would be to ignore their educational, political or other -al aspects, and the BBC's website doesn't have a subsection for Culture, or even Art(s), both of which might (what do you think?) be more appropriate.

The Guardian corrals together television, radio, digital media, publishing, advertising, marketing and PR for its annual Media 100 list - but leaves out videogames*. There's even a coupla bloggers in there. Its wonderful gamesblog is under blogs: games don't seem to be featured anywhere else on the site.

Mg100graphic

The Times puts Games & Puzzles under Arts & Ents, but videogames in Gadgets & Gaming (somehow they're related, thinks The Times) under Tech & Web - at the same time as announcing that we're all - all - soon to be gamers.

Should games be considered technology, like gadgets, or media, like websites or television? Course I'd say the latter but I think you could have predicted that...

(*Thanks to Matt for pointing this out today!)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515f7269e200e553b8e1fa8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Media Guardian 100: no gamers:

Comments

Coincidentally, I was in Boston yesterday successfully convincing a group of teachers that games are just literature, stories to be read or, in the case of some lucky students, written. They nodded. They understood. They played.

Tomorrow I've got to convince the other 900 attendees in my keynote. Wish me luck (and thanks for the "We're all gamers" link).

This is a major problem isn't it? The fact is really, these publications don't put nearly as much time into games as they do film or books in any case.

The Guardian is slightly better then the BBC at least, only slightly however.

I'd say that games are entertainment (or art at least, as much as films are). The problem is this won't change very fast. And without any decent criticism or really and decent reporting in the biased advertising-run game mags and sites, we're between a rock and a hard place eh?

Glad someone else noticed at least.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment